Here is an article about Ethereum: why not be possible not to look with a districted blockchain:
Ethereum: Unsustainable Dream of Scalability
Hi guys,
I read a lot about the problem of scalability in cryptocurrencies and how to run a complete bitcoin node is not a possibility on a mobile device, for example, as a result we become … outdated. But before I sink into this, let’s talk about the Elephant in the Room: Ethereum.
As we all know, traditional blockchain like Bitcoin (BTC) is experiencing scalability problems since its establishment. The Limited number of transactions on the block, combined with the high transaction taxes and the slow consensus algorithm, made it increasingly difficult to support an increased user base. But is ethereum really the answer to these problems? In this article, we will explore why sharding, a critical component of Ethereum Architecture, may not be possible.
Problem: Limited Scalability
Ethereum’s current consensus algorithm, proof of work (POW), failed to expand with increased network traffic and transaction volume. The Energy Consumption Required to extract these blocks is amazing, which leads to significant environmental problems. Moreover, the size limit of the fixed block means that, as more transactions are added to each block, the time required to confirm them can become long prohibitive.
Sharding: A solution?
One of the most promising solutions to address the scalability problems on ethereum is sharpening. Sharding involves dividing a blockchain into smaller, Independent, Independent Chains, each with its own network and Limited Capacity. This would allow more efficient processing and low energy consumption.
However, the implementation of the eyes on ethereum is not without his challenges. Here are some of the reasons why they may not be possible to change:
* Complexity : Sharding Requires Significant Changes in the Ethereum Protocol and Implementation, including updates of the Contract System, Data Structures and Consensus Algorithms.
* scalability : even if the sharding would be possible, it would require a massive amount of computing power and storage capacity to process transactions on multiple pieces. This would be expensive and potentially unsustainable for both users and developers.
* Inter-Shard Communication : Shards are not isolated from each other, which messages between the chunks must be transmitted by the Network, Adding Complexity and latency.
why ethereum architecture may not bear the implementation of fragments
The Ethereum architecture is built around a centralized consensus protocol (POW) and a blockchain with the size of the fixed block. This design limits the scalability of individual chains and makes it difficult to implement the widispread hats.
* Without Shaarded Nodes : The current Ethereum Network Architecture does not accept decentralized, Sharp Nodes, which can process transactions on multiple pieces.
* there are no sharpening protocols : there are no protocols or sharpening mechanisms to allow the creation of sharp chains in the ethereum ecosystem.
* Limited Improvement of Scalability : Any Attempt to Improve Scalability on Ethereum Would Require A Fundamental Redoc of the Protocol and Implementation, which is not possible at this time.
Conclusion
While ethereum showed him the promise with his concept of exchange, he can be too ambitious for the current architecture. The Limited Scalability Problems on Ethereum are well documented, and any attempt to implement the change without significant changes in the basic design would only aggravate these problems.
In Conclusion, While Ethereum is an innovative and promising project, its inability to support scalable, decentralized networks, such as Shaarded Chains, Makes It Less Viaable as a Long -Term Solution for Cryptocurrency Scaling.